STUDIES BY MARTIN KEITEL

CONCLUSIONS I'm quite pleased to have made this study - even though my initial goal wasn't acchieved; to show that the formation is probably natural. If you have seen other sites or read books about this subject, I'm sure you've seen much more indepth investigations. For my purposes this is however not essential. Just based on the findings on the previous pages I can conclude that: 1. The Mars face is very unlikely a natural formation only. 2. The formation must have been influenced by some sort of intelligent beings or forces - whether extra-terrestrial aliens or something else 3. The formation can be assumed to resemble a humanoid face intentionally. However, it's possible that this is a coincidence. You that have come to these pages from my Crop Circle site might be asking: "What relevance does this have to the Crop Circle phenomenon?" The connection is not direct, but there certainly is a relevance. The main argument from people that don't believe in the non-human origin of the Circles is that this assumption is irrational. Irrational because there is no evidence of non-human intelligence (note that I don't like to use the word "extra-terrestrial", because non-human intelligence in my opinion can be terrestrial or "superdimensional"). If we come to the conclusion that the Face on Mars is influenced by intelligent beings, the irrationality of the non-human origin of the Circles becomes a rationality - when we take into account that many features in the Circles suggest that they just can't be man-made. I want to point out once more that the face I reconstructed is not as regular and face-like as the original formation. Still it looks like an artificial shape from most angles and with most lightings. This is my personal opinion, like everything else presented on this page. Again, you have the right to disagree. But if you do, please explain to yourself (and preferably to me!) how this formation in your opinion can be natural.